Impact of teaching, learning, and assessment of medical law on cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills of medical students: a systematic review | BMC Medical Education

0
Impact of teaching, learning, and assessment of medical law on cognitive, affective and psychomotor skills of medical students: a systematic review | BMC Medical Education
  • Ben-Moshe N. The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine. J Med Ethics. 2019;45(6):404–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, Palmer SC. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Informatics. 2019;124:78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie JB, Cheng Y, Zou X, Gong N, Tucker JD, Wong B, Kleinman A. The vicious circle of patient–physician mistrust in China: health professionals’ perspectives, institutional conflict of interest, and building trust through medical professionalism. Dev World Bioeth. 2018;18(1):26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunk K. Library: HCP 114: Medical Law and Ethics for Health Care Professionals: APA Style Guide. 2018.

  • Asemani OEM. Medical law and executive guarantee of medical ethics. 2010.

  • McKenzie KC, Mishori R, Ferdowsian H. Twelve tips for incorporating the study of human rights into medical education. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):871–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim AF. Customary Practices as Exigencies in Islamic Law: between a source of Law and a legal Maxim. Oriens. 2018;46(1–2):222–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global minimum essential. Requirements in medical education. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):130–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CanMEDS. : Better standards, better physicians, better care.

  • Wong RS, Balasingam U. Teaching medical law in medical education. J Acad Ethics. 2013;11(2):121–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel L. Growing number of medical trainees named in complaints. In : Can Med Assoc; 2019.

  • Uma P, Ramani P, Sherlin HJ. Knowledge about legal aspects of medical negligence in India among Dentists–A Questionnaire Survey. Medico Legal Update. 2020;20(1):111–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi CE, Sedighinejad A, Biazar G, Yousefshahi F, Nabi BN, Rimaz S, Rafiee E, Mirblook F. Causes and consequences of Complaints against Anesthesiologists: a 5-year Retrospective Study. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2018;8(4):161–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCraw FR, Montanera D, Jackson JP, Keys JC, Hetzler DC, Mroz TA. Changes in liability claims, costs, and resolution times following the introduction of a communication-and-resolution program in Tennessee. J Patient Saf Risk Manage. 2018;23(1):13–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins DE. Multidisciplinary teamwork approach in labor and delivery and electronic fetal monitoring education: a medical-legal perspective. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008;22(2):125–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machin LL, Latcham N, Lavelle C, Williams R, Corfield L. Exploring the perceived medical ethics and law training needs of UK foundation doctors. Med Teach. 2020;42(1):92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SS, Kulenthran A, Sim JH. First year medical students’ perceptions towards integration of medical law in the medical curriculum: a pilot study. J Acad Ethics. 2016;14:169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts J. Learning the law: practical proposals for UK medical education. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(2):138–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitdikova LB, Shilovskaya AL, Starodumova SJ, Volkova MA. The medical law as an independent branch of law: history and development outlook. J Adv Res L Econ. 2015;6:439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittari G, Khuman R, Baldoni S, Pallotta G, Battineni G, Sirignano A, Amenta F, Ricci G. Telemedicine practice: review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020;26(12):1427–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez E, Fawcett A, Brouwer E, Rau J, Turner PV. Speaking up: veterinary ethical responsibilities and animal welfare issues in everyday practice. Animals. 2018;8(1):15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J, Wiltshire J, Delva J, Bello T, Masys AJ. Natural and manmade disasters: vulnerable populations. Global health security. edn.: Springer; 2020: 143–61.

  • Cohen DA, Newman LR, Fishman LN. Twelve tips on writing a discussion case that facilitates teaching and engages learners. Med Teach. 2017;39(2):147–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sazhin V, Karsanov A, Maskin S. Law and educational components of patient’s safety in surgery. Khirurgiia. 2018;1:50–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Mydin FH, Othman S. Elder abuse and neglect intervention in the clinical setting: perceptions and barriers faced by primary care physicians in Malaysia. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(23–24):6041–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solak Y, Yoldascan BE, Okyay RA. Assessment of the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of family physicians in Adana regarding child abuse and neglect. J Public Health. 2021;29(5):1135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulet JR, Durning SJ. What we measure… and what we should measure in medical education. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D. A practical guide for medical teachers. Elsevier health sciences; 2017.

  • Julian Higgins TL, Chandler J, Tovey D, Thomas J. Ella Flemyng, Rachel Churchill: Methodological Expectations of Cochrane intervention reviews (MECIR). Volume 5. London: Cochrane; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Gordon M, Dharamsi S, Gibbs T. Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):108–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker M, Willmott L, White B, Williams G, Cartwright C. Medical education and law: withholding/withdrawing treatment from adults without capacity. Intern Med J. 2015;45(6):634–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba R, Sikotra N, Wilson A, Clay TD, Gabbay E. Doctors’ understanding of consent law. Intern Med J. 2021;51(7):1068–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorovski N. Significance of medical law in medical school curriculum. Acta Med Medianae. 2018;57(3):60–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston-Shoot M, McKimm J. Towards effective outcomes in teaching, learning and assessment of law in medical education. Med Educ. 2011;45(4):339–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourão E, Pimentel JF, Murta L, Kalinowski M, Mendes E, Wohlin C. On the performance of hybrid search strategies for systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol. 2020;123:106294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DA, Kathlyn M, Fletcher E, Arora VM. Dated Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(12):829–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlang TR, Henderson D, Kolm P, Paiva R. The impact of legal medicine education on medical students’ attitudes toward law. Acad Med. 1985;60(4):279–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnough LT, Hull A, Kleinhenz M. Informed consent for blood transfusion as a transfusion medicine educational intervention. Transfus Med. 1994;4(1):51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcezak TJ, Lynch P, Jackson S, Richter J, Jaffe CC, Cadman EC. A web-based risk management and medical-legal curriculum for graduate medical education. J Biocommun. 1998;25(4):2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie J, Schwartz L, Morrison J. Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient’s request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(4):371–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu KE, Flood C, Capstick V. Is an interdisciplinary session on ethics and law in obstetrics and gynaecology effective? J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2005;27(5):486–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elger BS, Harding TW. Avoidable breaches of confidentiality: a study among students of medicine and of law. Med Educ. 2005;39(3):333–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlicher NR, Ten Eyck RP. Medical malpractice: utilization of layered simulation for resident education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1175–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen E, Fullerton DF, Retkin R, Weintraub D, Tames P, Brandfield J, Sandel M. Medical-legal partnership: collaborating with lawyers to identify and address health disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans A, Refrow-Rutala D. Medico-legal education: a pilot curriculum to fill the identified knowledge gap. J Graduate Med Educ. 2010;2(4):595–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, Wong RY. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan M, Day FC, Griffin E, Tancredi DJ, Burke W, Pinsky L, Pagon RA, Hoffman JR, Wilkes MS. Implementation outcomes of a multiinstitutional web-based ethical, legal, and social implications genetics curriculum for primary care residents in three specialties. Genet Sci. 2011;13(6):553–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drukteinis DA, O’Keefe K, Sanson T, Orban D. Preparing emergency physicians for malpractice litigation: a joint emergency medicine residency-law school mock trial competition. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(1):95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora KS. A trial of a reproductive ethics and law curriculum for obstetrics and gynaecology residents. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(12):854–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-C, Wang N-Y, Ko W-R, Yu Y-T, Lin L-Y, Tsai H-F. The effectiveness of clinical problem-based learning model of medico-jurisprudence education on general law knowledge for Obstetrics/Gynecological interns. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(3):325–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettignano R, Bliss L, McLaren S, Caley S. Interprofessional medical–legal education of medical students: assessing the benefits for addressing social determinants of health. Acad Med. 2017;92(9):1254–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanishevska KD, Ivakhniuk TV, Budko HY, Smiianov YV. Eyperimental model of an integrated approach to the training of legal and health care professionals on ussues of infection with especially dangerous infectious diseases. Wiad Lek. 2021;74:1109–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siswati S, Jama J, Rizal F, Giatman M. The effectiveness of problem based learning model with mind mapping in health law and ethics lectures. Turkish J Physiotherapy Rehabilitation 2021:12914–24.

  • Qiu P-L, Liu S-Y, Bradshaw M, Rooney-Latham S, Takamatsu S, Bulgakov TS, Tang S-R, Feng J, Jin D-N, Aroge T. Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomy of an unresolved, heterogeneous species complex within the genus Golovinomyces (Ascomycota, Erysiphales), including G. ambrosiae, G. circumfusus and G. spadiceus. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver R. Legal liability of students and residents in the health care setting. Acad Med. 1986;61(7):560–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves D. Combining law with medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 1987;13(3):134–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie S. AIDS and the responsibilities of academic health science centers: a case law approach. J Allied Health. 1992;21(2):69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell ME, Olsson HM. Swedish students’ attitudes toward abortion. Health Care Women Int. 1993;14(3):281–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto D, Itoh T, Suzuki J. Design of teaching materials for pharmaceutical law education. Yakugaku Zasshi: Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan. 2020;140(11):1389–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mąkosa P, Olszyńska A, Petryszyn K, Kozłowska H, Tomszys E, Stoltmann A, Małyszko J. Organ Procurement in Poland: Legal and Medical Aspects. In: Transplantation Proceedings: 2020: Elsevier; 2020: 2015–2025.

  • Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Gutiérrez PR, Gómez FJ, Santainés-Borredá E, Agras-Suarez MC, Iriarte J, Cañadas-De la Fuente GA, Herruzo R, Hurtado-Pardos B. Organ donation related with attitude toward the law of presumed consent: Spanish university medical and nursing students study. In: Transplantation Proceedings: 2020: Elsevier; 2020: 439–442.

  • Tait AR. Consent obtained by residents: informed by the uninformed? J Clin Ethics. 2019;30(2):163–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemann R, Melcher P, Eder C, Deckena J, Kasch R, Fröhlich S, März M, DGOU AL, Ghanem M. Informed consent for surgery: clearly regulated by the patient rights law—significant uncertainty among medical students: legal analysis and inventory of over 2500 medical students in Berlin as part of the Progress Test Medicine. Der Orthopäde 2021:1–8.

  • Chiapponi C, Meyer F, Jannasch O, Arndt S, Stübs P, Bruns CJ. Involving Medical students in informed consent: a pilot study. World J Surg. 2015;39(9):2214–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • AlMahmoud T, Hashim MJ, Almahmoud R, Branicki F, Elzubeir M. Informed consent learning: needs and preferences in medical clerkship environments. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0202466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker M. Teaching medical ethics and law. J Law Med. 2012;19(3):444–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie A. Making sense of ethics and law in the medical curriculum. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):384–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafran Y, Wolowelsky JB. Patient-centered bedside education and traditional jewish law and ethics. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 2012, 3(1).

  • Fenwick A. Medical ethics and law: assessing the core curriculum. J Med Ethics. 2014;40(10):719–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson N, Ryrie A, Glennerster R. Teaching medical law and ethics using letter-based narrative. Med Educ. 2016;50(11):1146–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Busaidi AS, Ganesh A, Al-Adawi S, Al-Farsi YM, Al-Rawahi MK, Al-Mawali NA, Al-Kharousi NS, Al-Alawi M, Al-Mujaini AS. Development and validation of an instrument to measure physician awareness of bioethics and medical law in Oman. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston-Shoot M, McKimm J. Prepared for practice? Law teaching and assessment in UK medical schools. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(11):694–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AT. Teaching law in medical schools: first, reflect. J law Med Ethics: J Am Soc Law Med Ethics. 2012;40(2):301–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aimakhu CO, Adepoju OJ, Nwinee HI, Oghide O, Shittu AA, Oladunjoye OA. Attitudes towards abortion law reforms in Nigeria and factors influencing its social acceptance among female undergraduates in a nigerian university. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2014;43(4):327–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnokova AE. Health Law and Medical Practice. AMA J Ethics. 2016;18(3):197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khatib Z, Herrera C, Campello G, Mattfeld E, Maalouf W. The role of Law Enforcement Officers/Police in Drug Prevention within Educational Settings-Study Protocol for the development of a Guiding Document based on experts’ opinions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021, 18(5).

  • Ringsted C, Henriksen AH, Skaarup AM, Van der Vleuten CP. Educational impact of in-training assessment (ITA) in postgraduate medical education: a qualitative study of an ITA programme in actual practice. Med Educ. 2004;38(7):767–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taras M. Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assess Evaluation High Educ. 2002;27(6):501–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckian J, Utukuri M, Asif A, Burton O, Adeyoju J, Oumeziane A, Chu T, Rees EL. Social media in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2021;55(11):1227–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L, Muston A, Alston SR, Pammi M, Thammasitboon S, Park S, Pawlikowska T, Rees EL. Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2020;42(11):1202–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M, Farnan J, Grafton-Clarke C, Ahmed R, Gurbutt D, McLachlan J, Daniel M. Non-technical skills assessments in undergraduate medical education: a focused BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 54. Med Teach. 2019;41(7):732–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean M, Gibbs T. Twelve tips to designing and implementing a learner-centred curriculum: Prevention is better than cure. Med Teach. 2010;32(3):225–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J. Dialogue, Monologue and Soliloquy in the large lecture class. Int J Teach Learn High Educ 2007, 19(2).

  • Leung E, Pluskwik E. Effectiveness of gamification activities in a project-based learning classroom. 2018.

  • Kolmos A. Problem-based and project-based learning. University science and mathematics education in transition. edn.: Springer; 2009: 261–80.

  • Pinho GC, Miranda EP, Tavares MAB, Alves DVA, Morais RXBd, Sobreira TM. Almeida SMVd: peer-assisted and Team-Based learning: a new hybrid strategy for Medical Education. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica. 2018;42:162–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanorriga C, Tsiotakis P, Jimoyiannis A. E-mentoring and novice teachers’ professional development: Program design and critical success factors. In: EdMedia + Innovate Learning: 2018: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2018: 1315–1324.

  • Uebe Mansur AF, Alves AC, Torres RB. Trello as virtual learning environment and active learning organiser for PBL classes: An analysis under Bloom’s Taxonomy. 2019.

  • Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaagib NA, Musa OA, Saeed AM. Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • AlQhtani A, AlSwedan N, Almulhim A, Aladwan R, Alessa Y, AlQhtani K, Albogami M, Altwairqi K, Alotaibi F, AlHadlaq A. Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden AS. Lecture skills in medical education. Indian J Pediatr. 1989;56:29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • GB F, Ibrahim A. Applying Project Based Learning to Flipped Bloom Taxonomy for Deep Understanding in Control Systems. 2020.

  • Kumar P, Saxena C, Baber H. Learner-content interaction in e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learn Environ. 2021;8(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabalee YB, Santally MI. Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: implications for institutional e-learning policy. Educ Inform Technol. 2021;26(3):2623–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathizadeh P, Heidari H, Masoudi R, Sedehi M, Khajeali F. Telenursing strategies in Iran: a narrative literature review. Int J Epidemiol Health Sci 2020, 1(3).

  • Anwar M, Yunus S, Nuswowati M. Analysis of students’ competence in chemistry cognitive test construction based on revised bloom’s taxonomy. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series: 2020: IOP Publishing; 2020: 042006.

  • Uygur J, Stuart E, De Paor M, Wallace E, Duffy S, O’Shea M, Smith S, Pawlikowska T. A best evidence in Medical Education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students: BEME Guide No. 51. Med Teach. 2019;41(1):3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagatpatan CP Jr., Valdezco JAT, Lauron JDC. Teaching the affective domain in community-based medical education: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2020;42(5):507–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramma Y, Bholoa A, Watts M, Nadal PS. Teaching and learning physics using technology: making a case for the affective domain. Educ Inq. 2018;9(2):210–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoach DB, Gable RK, Madura JP. Instrument development in the affective domain. Volume 10. Springer; 2013.

  • Green ZA, Batool S. Emotionalized learning experiences: tapping into the affective domain. Eval Program Plan. 2017;62:35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mata ÁNdS KPM, Braga LP, de Medeiros GCBS, de Oliveira Segundo VH, Bezerra INM, Pimenta IDSF, Nicolás IM, Piuvezam G. Training in communication skills for self-efficacy of health professionals: a systematic review. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laal M, Laal A, Aliramaei A. Continuing education; lifelong learning. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;116:4052–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch U, Cratsley K. Psychological mechanisms. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences 2020:4145–54.

  • Hollister B, Nair P, Hill-Lindsay S, Chukoskie L. Engagement in online learning: student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in education: 2022: Frontiers Media SA; 2022: 851019.

  • Sukhera J, Miller K, Scerbo C, Milne A, Lim R, Watling C. Implicit stigma recognition and management for health professionals. Acad Psychiatry. 2020;44:59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangor C. Changing attitudes by changing behavior. Principles of Social Psychology-1st International Edition 2014.

  • Rogers GD, Mey A, Chan PC. Development of a phenomenologically derived method to assess affective learning in student journals following impactive educational experiences. Med Teach. 2017;39(12):1250–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens M, Ormandy P. An evidence-based approach to measuring affective domain development. J Prof Nurs. 2019;35(3):216–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach. 2006;28(7):e185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzyk AJ, Lentz K, Green C, Fuller S, May DB, Roukema L. Emphasizing Bloom’s affective domain to reduce pharmacy students’ stigmatizing attitudes. Am J Pharm Educ 2017, 81(2).

  • Setiawan A, Mardapi D. The development of instrument for assessing students’ affective domain using self-and Peer-Assessment Models. Int J Instruction. 2019;12(3):425–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo AM. Assessing the affective domain. J Phys Educ Recreation Dance. 2003;74(4):44–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W-H, Kao H-Y, Wu S-H, Wei C-W. Development and evaluation of affective domain using student’s feedback in entrepreneurial massive Open Online Courses. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpkin AL, Walesby KE. Training tomorrow’s doctors. Future Hosp J. 2017;4(1):56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle SM, Eason CM, Nottingham S, Barrett JL. Athletic training students’ perceptions of mentorship in clinical education. Athletic Train Educ J. 2016;11(2):72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen MER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Medicine: J Association Am Med Colleges. 2011;86(6):706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Mangina E, Campbell AG. HMD-based virtual and augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review. Front Virtual Real. 2021;2:692103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haowen J, Vimalesvaran S, Kyaw BM, Car LT. Virtual reality in medical students’ education: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open. 2021;11(5):e046986.

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *